bl-mt798x/atf-20250711/docs/process/misra-compliance.csv

1	Seq	Dir / Rule	Number	Source	Category	Checker Enabled	Enforced	Comments
2	1	D	1.1	MISRA C 2012	Required	N/A	Yes
3	2	D	2.1	MISRA C 2012	Required	N/A	Yes
4	3	D	3.1	MISRA C 2012	Required	N/A	No	It can’t be done retroactively.
5	4	D	4.1	MISRA C 2012	Required	N/A	Yes
6	5	D	4.2	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	N/A	Yes
7	6	D	4.3	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
8	7	D	4.4	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Yes
9	8	D	4.5	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Yes
10	9	D	4.6	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	No	No	We use a mix of both. It would be too disruptive for the project to change.
11	10	D	4.7	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
12	11	D	4.8	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	No	No	Fixing all instances would involve invasive changes to the codebase for no good reason.
13	12	D	4.9	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	No	No	We mustn’t introduce new macros unless strictly needed, but this affects assert(), INFO(), etc. It creates too much noise in the report for little gain.
14	13	D	4.10	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
15	14	D	4.11	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
16	15	D	4.12	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
17	16	D	4.13	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Yes
18	17	D	4.14	MISRA C 2012 AMD-1	Required	Yes	Yes
19	18	R	1.1	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
20	19	R	1.2	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Optional	It bans __attribute__(()) and similar helpers.
21	20	R	1.3	MISRA C 2012	Required	N/A	Yes
22	21	R	2.1	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
23	22	R	2.2	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
24	23	R	2.3	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Optional	It prevents the usage of CASSERT().
25	24	R	2.4	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	No	No	Header files may use enumerations instead of defines to group sets of values.
26	25	R	2.5	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	No	No	We define many headers with macros that are unused in the project but may be used by non-upstream code or may be desirable for completeness.
27	26	R	2.6	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Yes
28	27	R	2.7	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	No	No	Doesn't allow for simple implementations of porting functions that don't require all parameters.
29	28	R	3.1	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
30	29	R	3.2	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
31	30	R	4.1	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
32	31	R	4.2	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Yes
33	32	R	5.1	MISRA C 2012	Required	No	No	We use weak symbols that prevent us from complying with this rule.
34	33	R	5.2	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
35	34	R	5.3	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
36	35	R	5.4	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
37	36	R	5.5	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
38	37	R	5.6	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
39	38	R	5.7	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Optional	Fixing all existing defects is problematic because of compatibility issues.
40	39	R	5.8	MISRA C 2012	Required	No	No	We use weak symbols that prevent us from complying with this rule.
41	40	R	5.9	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Yes
42	41	R	6.1	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
43	42	R	6.2	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
44	43	R	7.1	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
45	44	R	7.2	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
46	45	R	7.3	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
47	46	R	7.4	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
48	47	R	8.1	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
49	48	R	8.2	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
50	49	R	8.3	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
51	50	R	8.4	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
52	51	R	8.5	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
53	52	R	8.6	MISRA C 2012	Required	No	No	We use weak symbols that prevent us from complying with this rule.
54	53	R	8.7	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	No	No	Bans pattern of declaring funcs in private header that are used/defined in separate translation units, which seems over the top.
55	54	R	8.8	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
56	55	R	8.9	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Yes
57	56	R	8.10	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
58	57	R	8.11	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Optional	This may not be possible in some interfaces.
59	58	R	8.12	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
60	59	R	8.13	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Optional	The benefits of fixing existing code aren’t worth the effort.
61	60	R	8.14	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
62	61	R	9.1	MISRA C 2012	Mandatory	Yes	Yes
63	62	R	9.2	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
64	63	R	9.3	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
65	64	R	9.4	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
66	65	R	9.5	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
67	66	R	10.1	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Optional	Fixing existing code may be counter-productive and introduce bugs.
68	67	R	10.2	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
69	68	R	10.3	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Optional	Fixing existing code may be counter-productive and introduce bugs.
70	69	R	10.4	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Optional	Fixing existing code may be counter-productive and introduce bugs.
71	70	R	10.5	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Yes
72	71	R	10.6	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
73	72	R	10.7	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
74	73	R	10.8	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
75	74	R	11.1	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
76	75	R	11.2	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
77	76	R	11.3	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
78	77	R	11.4	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	No	No	This would be invasive for TF (e.g. in exported linker script macros). Also bans conversion from uintptr_t.
79	78	R	11.5	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	No	No	This seems to preclude the pattern of using void * in interfaces to hide the real object, which we use extensively.
80	79	R	11.6	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Optional	This is needed in several cases.
81	80	R	11.7	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
82	81	R	11.8	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
83	82	R	11.9	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
84	83	R	12.1	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Yes
85	84	R	12.2	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes	This rule is fine, but there are lots of false positives in Coverity.
86	85	R	12.3	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Yes
87	86	R	12.4	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Yes
88	87	R	12.5	MISRA C 2012 AMD-1	Mandatory	Yes	Yes
89	88	R	13.1	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
90	89	R	13.2	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
91	90	R	13.3	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Yes
92	91	R	13.4	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Yes
93	92	R	13.5	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
94	93	R	13.6	MISRA C 2012	Mandatory	Yes	Yes
95	94	R	14.1	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
96	95	R	14.2	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
97	96	R	14.3	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
98	97	R	14.4	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
99	98	R	15.1	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	No	No	In some cases goto may be useful for readability.
100	99	R	15.2	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
101	100	R	15.3	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
102	101	R	15.4	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Yes
103	102	R	15.5	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	No	No	This has no real value. It may make code less understandable than before.
104	103	R	15.6	MISRA C 2012	Required	No	No	This directly contradicts the Linux style guidelines and would require many changes. We would have to remove that rule from checkpatch.
105	104	R	15.7	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
106	105	R	16.1	MISRA C 2012	Required	No	No	Cannot comply with this unless we comply with 16.3
107	106	R	16.2	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
108	107	R	16.3	MISRA C 2012	Required	No	No	Returns within switch statements and fall-throughs can improve readability.
109	108	R	16.4	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
110	109	R	16.5	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
111	110	R	16.6	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
112	111	R	16.7	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
113	112	R	17.1	MISRA C 2012	Required	No	No	This is needed for printf.
114	113	R	17.2	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes	Bans recursion. We consider it acceptable if the max depth is known.
115	114	R	17.3	MISRA C 2012	Mandatory	Yes	Yes
116	115	R	17.4	MISRA C 2012	Mandatory	Yes	Yes
117	116	R	17.5	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Yes
118	117	R	17.6	MISRA C 2012	Mandatory	Yes	Yes
119	118	R	17.7	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Optional	In some cases it doesn’t add any value to the code (like with memset() or printf()).
120	119	R	17.8	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Optional	It would make some one-line functions grow in size for no reason.
121	120	R	18.1	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
122	121	R	18.2	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
123	122	R	18.3	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
124	123	R	18.4	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Yes
125	124	R	18.5	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Yes
126	125	R	18.6	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
127	126	R	18.7	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
128	127	R	18.8	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
129	128	R	19.1	MISRA C 2012	Mandatory	Yes	Yes
130	129	R	19.2	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Optional	Unions can be useful. We almost don’t use them, so it’s ok.
131	130	R	20.1	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Optional	In some files we have assembly-compatible includes followed by assembly-compatible definitions followed by C includes and C declarations. This is done to not have #ifdef in the include list.
132	131	R	20.2	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
133	132	R	20.3	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
134	133	R	20.4	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
135	134	R	20.5	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Yes
136	135	R	20.6	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
137	136	R	20.7	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
138	137	R	20.8	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Optional	We need a new configuration system to fix all defects.
139	138	R	20.9	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Optional	We use a mix of #if and #ifdef for boolean macros, which may raise some failures here. We should consistently use one or the other
140	139	R	20.10	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Optional	It’s good to avoid them, but they are sometimes needed.
141	140	R	20.11	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
142	141	R	20.12	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
143	142	R	20.13	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
144	143	R	20.14	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
145	144	R	21.1	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
146	145	R	21.2	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
147	146	R	21.3	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
148	147	R	21.4	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
149	148	R	21.5	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
150	149	R	21.6	MISRA C 2012	Required	No	No	This bans printf.
151	150	R	21.7	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
152	151	R	21.8	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
153	152	R	21.9	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
154	153	R	21.10	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
155	154	R	21.11	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
156	155	R	21.12	MISRA C 2012	Advisory	Yes	Yes
157	156	R	21.13	MISRA C 2012 AMD-1	Mandatory	Yes	Yes
158	157	R	21.14	MISRA C 2012 AMD-1	Required	Yes	Yes
159	158	R	21.15	MISRA C 2012 AMD-1	Required	Yes	Yes
160	159	R	21.16	MISRA C 2012 AMD-1	Required	Yes	Yes
161	160	R	21.17	MISRA C 2012 AMD-1	Mandatory	Yes	Yes
162	161	R	21.18	MISRA C 2012 AMD-1	Mandatory	Yes	Yes
163	162	R	21.19	MISRA C 2012 AMD-1	Mandatory	Yes	Yes
164	163	R	21.20	MISRA C 2012 AMD-1	Mandatory	Yes	Yes
165	164	R	22.1	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
166	165	R	22.2	MISRA C 2012	Mandatory	Yes	Yes
167	166	R	22.3	MISRA C 2012	Required	Yes	Yes
168	167	R	22.4	MISRA C 2012	Mandatory	Yes	Yes
169	168	R	22.5	MISRA C 2012	Mandatory	Yes	Yes
170	169	R	22.6	MISRA C 2012	Mandatory	Yes	Yes
171	170	R	22.7	MISRA C 2012 AMD-1	Required	Yes	Yes
172	171	R	22.8	MISRA C 2012 AMD-1	Required	Yes	Yes
173	172	R	22.9	MISRA C 2012 AMD-1	Required	Yes	Yes
174	173	R	22.10	MISRA C 2012 AMD-1	Required	Yes	Yes